A new nuke mission? Or perhaps a Helios One style super space laser? Wandering the remains of forests and rock in Fallout 3 was more than enough to set that, and the desert in Fallout: New Vegas would have set it well enough, even with loads of locations.Fallout 4 looks to offer quite a varied landscape and one shot I noticed made me very confident we wouldn’t get a Boston version of the Mojave. I can appreciate that in an apocalypse genre, barren wasteland is cool for setting the tone, but there is no need to make that so apparent in gameplay. I’m really hoping that Fallout 4 changes this.
Even after 100’s of hours I still don’t feel I’ve explored every nook and cranny of DC, where as New Vegas? I know the strip like the back of my hand cause there’s so little in it. Fallout 3 on the other hand had a whole corner (my map is a bit generous about this to be fair) of cool areas to explore and discover. Now look at the difference in space in what I would class as interesting places. Both maps are apparently the same size roughly, and clearly New Vegas has more locations, but they’re all just so… meh (as Tood Howard would say). Have a look at this map comparison I made myself.
Fallout 3 on the other hand had DC, and all of that was cool. It’s not a good map, it’s a collection of cool areas, and very few at that. So a lot of people really prefer Fallout: New Vegas to Fallout 3, but if there’s one thing that I just hate about Fallout: New Vegas it’s the environment. Getting hyped like it’s 2287 Literally a ‘Waste’-land So with Fallout 4 announced (ages ago now it seems) for 10th Novemember 2015, just around the corner, it seems like a good time to compare what we know with Fallout: New Vegas and see what should change and what should return.
0 kommentar(er)
